Alibaba closed at USD 108.56, down 0.77%.

BABA’s options tape showed a heavy institutional tilt toward downside exposure, headlined by a $9.93 million long put package on the 2026 $140/$150 strikes. Despite the stock’s modest decline, large traders paid substantial premium for convex bearish positions, suggesting conviction that further weakness lies ahead. The flow was not matched by comparable upside conviction, with most bullish structures appearing smaller or structured as premium collection rather than outright directional bets.

>>>Start OPTIONS trading & earn up to SGD 200 in rewards!

Options Indicators

BABA’s implied volatility is 43.21%, and with an IV percentile of 27.89%, current option pricing sits on the cheaper side of its recent range, indicating volatility is relatively subdued rather than elevated. The IV/HV ratio of 1.03 suggests implied volatility is broadly in line with realized volatility, so options do not appear meaningfully overstretched despite the moderate absolute IV level.

The Call/Put volume ratio is 0.96.

Large Trades

A directional put-buy package worth $9.93 million stood out as one of the day’s largest trades, with buyers simultaneously purchasing the September 18, 2026 $140 puts and $150 puts. With BABA referenced at $108.67, both strikes were in the money, making this a same-direction double-long put structure that signals an aggressive bearish stance and a view that downside risk remains meaningful even from already elevated strike levels. Because both legs were bought, this was a net-debit bearish position rather than a premium-selling structure, and the trade suggests the participant was willing to pay substantial premium for convex downside exposure into the longer-dated expiry.

A net-credit four-leg cross-expiry call-and-put combination worth $167,200 was the other displayed large trade, involving a short September 18, 2026 $112 call, a long September 18, 2026 $100 put, a long September 11, 2026 $115 call, and a long September 11, 2026 $103 put. With the stock at $108.67, the $112 and $115 calls were out of the money, while the $100 and $103 puts were also out of the money, making this a relatively balanced volatility-and-timing structure rather than a clean one-way synthetic. The small net credit indicates the trader established the package with premium intake, likely seeking to express a view around near-term versus later-dated movement while limiting outright cost, with the short later-dated upside call adding a mildly bearish overlay and the paired long wings preserving event-driven optionality.

Overall, the large-trade flow leans clearly bearish on BABA. The biggest premium commitment was directed into long puts, and the broader bulk-order profile shows downside exposure outweighing upside exposure, indicating that institutional traders were more focused on protecting against or positioning for weakness than chasing a sustained rally. While there were some bullish premium-collection and upside call elements in the tape, they were smaller and less conviction-heavy than the put buying, so the dominant takeaway is cautious-to-bearish sentiment with traders favoring downside structures and defensive positioning.

Strategy Reference

For a lower assignment-probability sell-side candidate against the bearish flow, a neutral-to-slightly-bullish trader could consider selling a short-dated 7-10 delta OTM put, such as a September 2026 $85 put at roughly 7 delta, to collect premium while keeping downside room beneath the heavy put-purchase zone; those unwilling to post large margin for naked short puts may prefer a put credit spread using the $85/$80 strikes.