A fresh set of metrics is compelling the entire AI short drama sector to take a closer look at DUIBA. Following the company's voluntary announcement on August 24, DUIBA (01753) saw its share price surge within a single week, with capital markets casting their votes through real investment—recognizing the pace this decade-old user operations SaaS firm has achieved in the AI short drama arena. Underpinning this wave of confidence are the three-month sequential figures from Douyin's native traffic: June saw 1.64 billion new plays, ranking fourth; July climbed to 2.96 billion plays, leaping to second place; and August hit 4.55 billion plays, holding steady at third. Month-over-month growth reached 80.9% and 53.6% for July and August respectively, a 2.8-fold increase over just two months.
Behind this growth trajectory lies a far harsher industry reality—in the first half of 2026, Douyin's native platform added 221,900 new AI dramas and animated series, yet only 1,055 surpassed 100 million plays, a success rate of just 0.47%. Even setting 50 million plays as the breakeven threshold, only 1.3% of titles met the mark, meaning over 98.7% of productions failed to recoup their costs. In a sector where merely one in 200 titles breaks through the 100-million-play barrier, what does DUIBA's ranking trajectory actually signify? This naturally raises the question: why DUIBA?
The answer lies in two core strengths embedded within the company's DNA. The first is a data-driven foundation. DUIBA has spent nearly a decade running performance-based advertising through its SaaS platform, calculating click-through rates, conversion metrics, and return on ad spend daily—"validating through data rather than relying on intuition" is an operational habit ingrained throughout the organization. So when entering AI short dramas, its first instinct wasn't to hire screenwriters but to deploy algorithms to solve for hit content. Its proprietary screenwriting Agent harvests real-time data on high-paying, high-completion dramas across the web, extracts trending themes, and generates new scripts via AI, boosting frontline writer efficiency fivefold. Eighty percent of production flows through one-click workflows; labor expenses account for just 40% of costs while token costs make up 60%, with large model pricing continuing to decline month over month. By comparison, some AI short drama rivals allocate 50%–70% of costs to labor, primarily due to heavy manual involvement in storyboarding, directing, and editing.
The second strength is traffic distribution expertise. At its core, AI short drama is a "content-as-advertising-vehicle" business—final net profits derive from rebates paid by agencies or platforms after paid traffic acquisition. The real competitive edge isn't producing aesthetically superior dramas but mastering "how much to spend on traffic, how many plays it generates, and how many conversions into paid users." Hongguo relies primarily on organic traffic with no ability to scale via paid promotion, leaving growth certainty severely constrained if dependent on a single channel. In contrast, leveraging a decade of traffic distribution experience, DUIBA built its proprietary ad-bidding system by February, enabling one-click distribution across Douyin native, Kuaishou, Bilibili, Tencent, Baidu, and Taobao platforms.
This strategy produced tangible results: cumulative first-half revenue reached 223 million yuan, representing 51.2% of the group's total revenue of 434.7 million yuan. First-half total revenue grew 24.3% year over year to 435 million yuan, gross profit reached 74.54 million yuan with gross margin recovering to 17.1%, and net losses narrowed 5% to 25.33 million yuan. This brings us to the second question: can DUIBA's achievements be sustained?
The biggest pitfall in this industry is "betting on a single hit." After one or two breakout successes, production capacity collapses and costs spiral out of control—that's the typical endgame for most companies pivoting into this space. DUIBA's solution is its one-person producer OPP model: unlike traditional players from content backgrounds that rely on multi-person collaboration, DUIBA assigns a single individual to manage the entire production pipeline—shorter feedback loops, fewer variables, making hit dramas more trackable and replicable while keeping producer talent requirements contained and manageable. This enables systematic scaling of high-quality teams. Internal iterations during the first half have already stabilized individual production capacity at three dramas per month.
Even more critical is the self-evolving closed loop of "production-distribution-feedback-optimization": real-time data on plays, completion rates, engagement, and conversions from all platforms flows back into content creation, ensuring each successive drama aligns more closely with market demand. By extrapolating this mature closed loop, DUIBA is repositioning itself from a "content production company" into an "AI content industrialization platform." Consumer-side paid monetization has already proven viable, generating over 200 million yuan in just six months. The short drama SDK alliance represents the most promising growth catalyst for the second half—packaging content, products, operations, and monetization into an SDK embeddable across its network of 16,000 partner apps, enabling zero-cost native short drama sections. Based on projections of "100 apps averaging 5 million DAU × 10% penetration × 0.3 yuan ARPU," this represents an addressable opportunity of roughly 15 million yuan per day.
Add the overseas blue ocean market to the equation, and future upside becomes even more substantial: the global micro-drama market is projected to exceed 6 billion USD in 2026, featuring better payment habits and greater pricing power. The industry is left with a single question: in this content production industrial revolution, only players who understand both traffic and industrialization will prevail. And DUIBA is already the earliest mover on that path.